(with David Benjamin)
First draft: October, 2007
This draft: April, 2008
[PDF]
In this paper, we present evidence from a new database to show that negotiations to restructure sovereign
debts are lengthy and costly, taking more than seven years to complete, resulting in creditor losses of more
than forty per-cent, and leaving debtor countries with debt levels forty per-cent higher (scaled by GDP) than
when they entered default. We also document the economic circumstances that lead to especially protracted
defaults. We then present a theory of sovereign debt renegotiation that can account for these empirical findings.
In the theory, delays arise due to the same commitment issues that lead to default: as the debtor's ability to
share future surplus created by a debt restructuring is limited by future default risk, the debtor and creditor
find it privately optimal to delay restructuring until future default risk is low, even when delay may be
socially inefficient.
(with Mike Tomz)
First draft: October 30, 2007
This draft: June 09, 2008
[PDF]
This paper examines two major risks to foreign investors: default on
sovereign debt and expropriation of foreign direct investment, which we
refer to collectively as "sovereign
theft." Using a series of formal models, we analyze how
the incentives to engage in sovereign theft vary with the state of the
economy, the risk aversion of political leaders, and the nature of
punishments for default and expropriation. We then document patterns of
sovereign theft and foreign investment across much of the twentieth century.
Our research, based on a new data set, reveals a striking asynchronicity:
defaults and expropriations have occurred in alternating---rather than
coincident---waves. Our findings shed new light on cooperation and conflict
in the international economy.
This paper was prepared for the Conference on Populism in Natural Resources, held at the Kennedy
School of Government, Harvard University, 1-2 November 2007.
(with Rohan Pitchford)
First draft: August 20, 2006
[PDF]
Sovereign defaults are time consuming and costly to resolve ex post. But these costs also
improve borrowing incentives ex ante. What is the optimal tradeoff between efficient
borrowing ex ante and the costs of default ex post? What policy reforms, from collective
action clauses to an international bankruptcy court, would attain this optimal tradeoff?
Towards an answer to these questions, this paper presents a simple incomplete markets model
of sovereign borrowing that is coupled with an explicit and flexible model of the sovereign
debt restructuring process. We characterize the optimal amount of delay, and explore numerically
the effects of various policy options on the amount of delay in renegotiations, and on the
efficiency of capital flows.
(with Michael Tomz)
First draft: August 10, 2006
This draft: September 18, 2006
[PDF]
This paper uses a new dataset to study the relationship between economic output and sovereign
default for the period 1820-2004. We find a negative but surprisingly weak relationship between
output and default. Throughout history, countries have indeed defaulted during bad times (when
output was relatively low), but they have also maintained debt service in the face of severe
adverse shocks, and they have defaulted when domestic economic conditons were favorable. We
show that this constitutes a puzzle for standard theories, which predict a much tighter negative
relationship as default provides partial insurance against declines in output.
This paper was prepared for the Annual Congress of the European Economic
Association held in Vienna, 24th to 28th August 2006
Working paper version (describes our data sources, empirical
results, and numerical methods in greater detail)
[PDF]
(with David Miller and Michael Tomz)
First draft: January 20, 2006
[PDF]
Governments default on their foreign debts with surprising regularity. Given the
costs of default, to both creditors and to the defaulting country, is it possible to
reform the international financial system to minimize the incidence and severity of
debt crises while still promoting efficient capital flows? This paper uses evidence
from a new historical dataset on the relationship between sovereign borrowing and
defaults to discipline the development of a model in which defaults occur in equilibrium.
In the context of this model, the optimal form of supra-national intervention ("bailouts")
is derived.
First draft: December 23, 2004
[PDF]
The market for developing country sovereign debt has become
increasingly competitive. Is this necessarily good for welfare? Or, is
there scope for beneficial government intervention to reduce
competition, and promote coordination, among creditors? This note
reviews recent theoretical work on the market for developing country
sovereign debt that shows that competition can reduce welfare. Further,
it argues that while private sector creditor organizations have been
successful at coordinating existing creditors in history, government
intervention to discourage entry by new creditors may be welfare
improving today.
This version: January 16, 2005
[PDF]
Are there large unexploited gains from international financial
integration? Why do they remain unexploited? This paper shows that when
market incompleteness leads foreigners and residents to value firms
differently, multiple equilibria arise where domestic residents
purchase inefficient domestic-owned firms.
(with Esteban Rossi-Hansberg)
This version: October 24, 2005
[PDF]
Why do growth and net exit rates of establishments decline with size? What determines the size distribution of establishments? This paper presents a theory of establishment dynamics that simultaneously rationalizes the basic facts on economy-wide establishment growth, net exit, and size distributions. The theory emphasizes the accumulation of industry specific human capital in response to industry specific productivity shocks. It implies that establishment growth and net exit rates should decline faster with size, and that their size distribution should have thinner tails, in sectors that use human capital less intensively, or correspondingly, physical capital more intensively. In line with the theory, we document substantial sectoral heterogeneity in US establishment dynamics and establishments size distributions, which is well explained by variation in physical capital intensities.
This paper previously circulated with the title “Firm Size Dynamics in the Aggregate Economy”,
and is available as National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 11261.
(with Esteban Rossi-Hansberg)
First draft: March 14, 2003
This version: May 21, 2004
[PDF]
Most economic activity occurs in cities. This creates a tension between local increasing returns, implied by the existence of cities, and aggregate constant returns, implied by balanced growth. To address this tension, we develop a theory of economic growth in an urban environment. We show how the urban structure is the margin that eliminates local increasing returns to yield constant returns to scale in the aggregate, thereby implying a city size distribution that is well described by a power distribution with coefficient one: Zipf's Law. Under strong assumptions our theory produces Zipf's Law exactly. More generally, it produces the systematic deviations from Zipf's Law observed in the data, namely the under-representation of small cities and the absence of very large ones. In these cases, the model identifies the standard deviation of industry productivity shocks as the key parameter determining dispersion in the city size distribution. We present evidence that the dispersion of city sizes is consistent with the dispersion of productivity shocks in the data.
Technical Appendix [PDF]
Read about this paper in: Douglas Clement (2004). "Sets
and the City." The Region, September.
First draft: July, 2001
This version: September, 2002
Why do countries repay their debts? If countries in default have suffcient opportunities to save, Bulow and Rogoff (1989) have shown that the answer cannot stem from a country’s desire to preserve a reputation for repayment. As a result, researchers have explained the existence of sovereign debt by either placing restrictions on the deposit contracts banks can other, or by looking outside the credit market for alternative means of enforcement, including the imposition of trade embargoes, or spillovers to other reputational relationships of the country. In contrast, in this paper we demonstrate that a country’s concern for it’s reputation can work to enforce repayment without placing any technological restrictions on the ability of banks to other contracts, and without appealing to any mechanisms outside of the credit market itself, as long as there are incentives for banks to tacitly collude in punishing a country in default. Such incentives exist as long as the number of banks is not too large, even if banks make zero profits.
This version: February, 2005
[PDF]
What has been the effect of the shift in emerging market capital
flows toward
private sector borrowers? Are emerging market capital flows more
efficient? If
not, can controls on capital flows improve welfare? This paper shows
that
the answers depend on the form of default risk. When private loans are
enforceable,
but there is the risk that the government will default on behalf of
all residents, private lending is inefficient and capital controls are
potentially
Pareto-improving. However, when private agents may individually
default, capital
flow subsidies are potentially Pareto-improving.
This version: 2002
The shift in emerging market debt towards bonds has prompted a number of proposals for reform of the international financial system with a view to facilitating coordination among a dispersed body of creditors. These proposals vary in the extent to which they advocate a return to the institutional framework that governed the 19th Century experience with bond financing, and the adoption of measures designed to compel agreement amongst creditors. This paper first examines the history of bondholder councils in the 19th Century and argues, contrary to the existing literature, that their most important function was to circulate information concerning which debtors were in default and under embargo, and just as importantly, which creditors were in violation of these embargos. That is, bondholder councils acted to influence both a debtors and a creditors reputation for cooperation. The paper then presents a model of a bondholder council that rationalizes these observations. Like the model of Greif, Milgrom and Weingast (1994), the model emphasizes the role of institutions in providing information sufficient to support cooperation. Unlike that model, the focus is on providing information sufficient to support equilibria that are proof to renegotiation. The paper then examines changes in the legal environment since this earlier era of bond finance and argues that they are likely to have reduced the efficacy of private, wholly voluntary, mechanisms for dealing with default. As these changes are unlikely to be repealed, this may constitute a case for involuntary mechanisms.
This version: 2001
This paper studies risk sharing and growth in a large linear-isoelastic economy in which agents cannot commit to honoring their contracts. Although information is perfect, limited commitment reduces the ability of agents to insure against idiosynchratic production risk. We make three methodological and two substantive contributions. Methodologically, first we characterize stationary efficient allocations by extending techniques developed by Atkeson and Lucas (1993) and (1996) for large private information endowment economies to limited commitment production economies with an unbounded state space. Second, we circumvent the non-convexity inherent in limited commitment production economies with risk averse agents in a direct fashion and provide closed form solutions for agents' consumption and savings functions. Third, we decentralize these allocations in a competitive equilibrium with solvency constraints in the sense of Alvarez and Jermann (2000). These constraints take a pseudo-collateralized form: borrowing limits are linear in accumulated capital, even when capital cannot be seized in lieu of repayment. These techniques are then applied to two substantive issues. First, we show that the effect of limited commitment on investment is ambiguous: agents may accumulate either more or less capital than under full insurance. This conflicts with a number of conjectures in the literature, as well as with the results of similar models with private information. Second, we establish a form of observational equivalence between allocations supported by an agent’s reputation for repayment and those supported by the threat of direct sanctions against defaulters.
(with Henry Ergas)
Read about this paper in: Ross Gittins (1994). "It could be that we are trading more but enjoying it less." The Sydney Morning Herald, September 17th, Page 42.